While in the Chicago area we decided to visit the Illinois Holocaust Museum. The museum is located in Skokie, a community that was the focus
of a neo-Nazi march in the late 1970s. At the time the population of Skokie was
half Jewish and home to about 7000 survivors. The march galvanized the
community which organized a foundation to support Holocaust education,
ultimately leading to the museum.
I have visited many Holocaust museums and exhibitions throughout the
years and done much reading on the Holocaust. Through the Jewish
Identity and Legacy Project I have also done a number of interviews with
survivors. I came to this visit with a fair amount of knowledge so was
curious if I would find anything new. My test of a good museum is if I
experience new information and insights that cause me to examine my
knowledge from a different vantage point. The Illinois Holocaust Museum
passed that test with flying colors.
The entrance to the museum was past bushes with branches that were as
gnarly as fingers.Spiky rocks set in the ground at various angles
mirrored the larger field of boulders one finds at Treblinka, each
representing a town, a lost Jewish community. The architecture was
clearly designed to mimic that of a prison, but also had a reflection
room designed to capture light, the antithesis of the dark prison-like
structure.
The exhibition began with a view of those lost Jewish communities,
preserved in memory and faded photos. One cannot fully understand the
impact of the Holocaust without realizing that in addition to countless
lives, a world was lost, whole communities erased.
We then moved into a historical view of Hitler's rise to power.
Unsuccessful in his first attempt at political power he decided to use
the democratic process to in effect vote democracy down. I found myself
reflecting on the recent political environment in the US and the
attempts to suppress access to voting. As an American Jew I have never
believed that any country is immune from the events of the Holocaust,
even the United States. I think that is a fundamental difference
between me and my non-Jewish friends and it deeply informs my political
views. I believe we must always be vigilant in protecting human rights
as each incursion brings us closer to a precipice, a diminishment of our
humanity that makes all sorts of evil possible.
As Hitler's power built, many Germans supported him on economic grounds
even though they didn't share his anti-Semitic views. They assumed that
once in power he would be forced to moderate his views. I have heard
uncomfortable echoes of such beliefs in our recent political discourse,
reminding me once again of the vulnerability of any country once it
loses its mooring in fundamental human rights. I am convinced that
there are lessons to be learned in the study of this prewar time in
German history.
The museum then began to move into the events which first affected
German Jews. They looked at the Jews who escaped Germany before the war,
50% exited as they witnessed the looming dangers up close. I had
interviewed a woman whose parents were able to escape to Shanghai and a
woman who was on the Kindertransport to London. These two stories were
echoed in the Shanghai and Kindertransport stories told at the museum.
Until my interview with Trudy I had not realized that the early policies
of the Nazis encouraged Jews to leave Germany. Trudy had told me that
her father was released from a concentration camp on the condition that
he leave the country. He was required to report to the Gestapo each
week on his plans. Documents in the museum told precisely this story.
It was only with the conquering of additional countries with their
significant Jewish populations coupled with the unwillingness of other
countries to accept the Jews,that the Germans began to concoct the Final
Solution to what they referred to as the Jewish Problem.
The exhibition continues through the early measures against the Jews to
gathering them in ghettos and ultimately their extermination in forests
and camps. The initial measures were gradually implemented with an
awareness of the world response which in fact proved negligible. Here
again was another point where actions taken could have altered the flow
of world events. When word of the camps was sent through diplomatic
channels, the State Department with its anti-Semitic bent suppressed the
message. How can one adequately address the movement from bigotry to murder
when one is infested with the same bigotry?
Countries fell like dominoes to Hitler's advances. A telling comment by
one of the survivors in the museum video was that the Jews of the Warsaw
Ghetto succeeded in standing up to the Nazis for longer than any
country that he invaded. When I reflected on why that was possible I
noted that the Jews of the Warsaw ghetto saw certain death ahead, they chose to fight to the end and die with dignity if necessary.
Countries did not hold that same perspective.
The other fact that the museum noted was that two wars were being
fought, one for world domination and one against the Jews. The US only
participated in the first war. I had not bisected the war into two
wars, but that perspective clarifies the role of the US and its failure
to respond to Jewish refugees and news of the camps until the end of the
war when there was no room for denial.
The museum also goes a step beyond liberation to follow the lives of
survivors from Displaced Persons (DP) camps on through immigration into their new lives and
new families. The museum does an impressive job of sharing the full
breadth of the story and highlighting aspects that made me consider the
gradual erosions in civilized society that can lead to unthinkable
horrors.
No comments:
Post a Comment